Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: And if they do? When your story was vetted with actual proof it wouldn't be an "If" you dense clown 🤡 Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 minute ago, Goukosan said: It's like you don't know what a vetted source and vetted proof means.....that's quite obvious because your story has neither any proof or a vetted source They story said "if" and cooke said confirmed Vetting is the process of performing a background check on someone before offering them employment, conferring an award, or doing fact-checking prior to making any decision. In addition, in intelligence gathering, assets are vetted to determine their usefulness.[1 The dispute is not over the meaning of the word vetting gouk. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, Goukosan said: When your story was vetted with actual proof it wouldn't be an "If" you dense clown 🤡 Who should vet it? If the New York Post vets it you won't believe it. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 https://apelbaum.wordpress.com/2020/10/15/hunter-biden-laptop-images-are-authentic/ Hunter Biden Laptop Images Are Authentic Link to post Share on other sites
lostfool 680 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: lol thats actually pretty funny. And also true, the justices are supposed to not have public opinions on sitting presidents. Oh yeah, where is that written? Nowhere. Stick to your own country. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Who should vet it? If the New York Post vets it you won't believe it. The reason NYP won't vet it because it requires providing actual proof..... which they do not have..... see how that works..... Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, lostfool said: Oh yeah, where is that written? Nowhere. Stick to your own country. Its not a law. But they should be seen as being unbiased. Do you not agree? Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, Goukosan said: The reason NYP won't vet it because it requires providing actual proof..... which they do not have..... see how that works..... ill vet it for them. Brb. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Its not a law. But they should be seen as being unbiased. Do you not agree? Lmfao... you made a false claim.. got called out and now trying to spin it as an opinion Edited October 16, 2020 by Goukosan Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said: ill vet it for them. Brb. That would require actual proof to show..... so take your time ⌚ Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 Just now, Goukosan said: Lmfao... you made a false claim.. got called out ane now trying to spin it to an opinion I said supposed to.. its kind of a given now. Do you want supreme court justices spouting their opinions on sitting presidents? they are SUPPOSED to be unbiased. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 https://nypost.com/2020/10/15/deconstructing-twitters-excuses-for-suppressing-posts-hunter-biden-scoops/ Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 431 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 4 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: explain alt right to us. You seem to blanket use the word like people use racist and nazi. You, it's you. It's mostly people who think they are so clever yet fall into all the obvious traps meant to radicalize you're exact demographic. I'm sure you dont consider yourself alt right but you damn sure use their sources, argue their causes, and criticize their peeves. Pretty much 9 times out of 10. The whole reason the alt right exist is to trick "centrist" in actually moving further right. Those people who are just smart enough to know Fox News and Alex Jones are full of it, but also will parrot anyone who talks in an NPR voice and shares their biases. Link to post Share on other sites
lostfool 680 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: I said supposed to.. its kind of a given now. Do you want supreme court justices spouting their opinions on sitting presidents? they are SUPPOSED to be unbiased. I guess you didn't look at the date on the cover did you? She didn't make a comment about a sitting President. That article was written in July of 2016 before Trump was officially nominated by the Republican party. Trump was a candidate not a SITTING PRESIDENT. Again you should stay out of U.S. politics. You are completely ignorant. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 4 hours ago, lostfool said: I guess you didn't look at the date on the cover did you? She didn't make a comment about a sitting President. That article was written in July of 2016 before Trump was officially nominated by the Republican party. Trump was a candidate not a SITTING PRESIDENT. Again you should stay out of U.S. politics. You are completely ignorant. Cooke is a an ass clown... what's new? Link to post Share on other sites
Hot Sauce 2,743 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 The original NYP article included a Delaware court order to turn over the laptop, so I'm not sure why the seizing of the laptop is a topic of discussion. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,041 Posted October 16, 2020 Author Share Posted October 16, 2020 12 hours ago, Goukosan said: Cooke is a an ass clown... what's new? Says the fool who can't see any hypocrisy whatsoever Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 431 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 41 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Says the fool who can't see any hypocrisy whatsoever Sorry, bro. You're very often out of your depth. Like the fact that multiple non-maniacs all say the same thing doesn't kind of make you think? Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,283 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said: Says the fool who can't see any hypocrisy whatsoever Bro you can't read and comprehend basic shit and and as per usual have been embarrassed several times in this thread. example 17 hours ago, lostfool said: I guess you didn't look at the date on the cover did you? She didn't make a comment about a sitting President. That article was written in July of 2016 before Trump was officially nominated by the Republican party. Trump was a candidate not a SITTING PRESIDENT. Again you should stay out of U.S. politics. You are completely ignorant. Fucking destroyed again Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts