Jump to content

Open Club  ·  22 members  ·  Rules

All Things Politics

Video shows Wisconsin police shooting a Black man multiple times as he enters a car


Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, jehurey said:

The police can do something with their hands besides wield a gun.

 

You have absolutely no answers for real life.

Obviously they can, but some don't. Why risk it? I wouldnt. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 353
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

And the obsession over cock continues

He’s in police custody now, and he went to Illinois where apparently is only 36 mins away though.   Poor kid. If Jacob Blake wasn’t such a maniacal tyrant and got himself shot 7 times by pol

Ok im locking this

Posted Images

41 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No.  THat's not acceptable.

 

We as a society can and SHOULD change cops, if that is the case.

 

If cops cannot find a way to handle this, they should be defunded and have that money directed to other specialists who are trained with other skills to handle this.

 

You do not simply say "welp............this is a glaring flaw...........the rest of society must find a way around to operate with this flaw in the machine"

 

That's bullshit.  That isn't an answer.

Never said it was acceptable. But it is what it is. Your police are idiots, why tempt fate when you don't have to? This is in no way putting blame on the person who got shot. There are just better choices in a situation like that. If it were you what would you have done?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

Obviously they can, but some don't. Why risk it? I wouldnt. 

That's not how this works.

 

The police is something we can specify down to SPECIFIC PROTOCOLS.

 

Not the random people on the street.

 

You are looking at this completely wrong.

 

That's like saying why bother engineering better automobiles and traffic laws, just wear more padded clothing to increase your chances of surviving, and choose to drive at certain hours of the day where there's less traffic.

 

That's just stupid. People who think like that shouldn't be in charge of anything.

Edited by jehurey
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

Obviously they can, but some don't. Why risk it? I wouldnt. 

The suspension of logic while you request the NBA to apply pressure on the Chinese (Authoritarian) Government, but simultaneously advise people to acquiesce to the demands of police - regardless if they're right; is amazing. Keep up the good work.

  • dead 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

Never said it was acceptable. But it is what it is.

No it isn't "what it is"

 

It can be changed.

 

It will be changed.

 

But not from people like you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jehurey said:

That's not how this works.

 

The police is something we can specify down to SPECIFIC PROTOCOLS.

 

Not the random people on the street.

 

You are looking at this completely wrong.

 

That's like saying why bother engineering better automobiles, just wear more padded clothing to increase your chances of surviving, and choose to drive at certain hours of the day where there's less traffic.

 

That's just stupid. People who think like that shouldn't be in charge of anything.

That's how it worked though..if you ignore police and attempt to flee, they are going to try and stop you, some of them may shoot you. We've seen it time and time again. So again, what would you have done?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Teh_Diplomat said:

The suspension of logic while you request the NBA to apply pressure on the Chinese (Authoritarian) Government, but simultaneously advise people to acquiesce to the demands of police - regardless if they're right; is amazing. Keep up the good work.

:lawl:fucking slaughtered

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

That's how it worked though..if you ignore police and attempt to flee, they are going to try and stop you, some of them may shoot you. We've seen it time and time again. So again, what would you have done?

Nope.

 

We have specific laws for evading police.

 

NONE of them come with a death sentence. NONE OF THEM.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Teh_Diplomat said:

The suspension of logic while you request the NBA to apply pressure on the Chinese (Authoritarian) Government, but simultaneously advise people to acquiesce to the demands of police - regardless if they're right; is amazing. Keep up the good work.

What would you have done? Knowing what we know about Americans cops, what would you have diplo? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

What would you have done? Knowing what we know about Americans cops, what would you have diplo? 

Grabbed him, put him up against the car.

 

Use these things called HANDCUFFS..................they cuff the hands, y'know.:lemming:

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Nope.

 

We have specific laws for evading police.

 

NONE of them come with a death sentence. NONE OF THEM.

It doesn't fucking matter what the law is. YOUR COPS ARE ASSHOLES REGARDLESS!!!!!! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cooke (not admin cant help said:

It doesn't fucking matter what the law is. YOUR COPS ARE ASSHOLES REGARDLESS!!!!!! 

you're right............they need to be prosecuted and fired until they learn their lesson, or they learn that they need to quit because they can't do it anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Grabbed him, put him up against the car.

 

Use these things called HANDCUFFS..................they cuff the hands, y'know.:lemming:

I know what they should have done dipshit. Holy fuck 

Edited by Cooke (not admin cant help
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll try this one last time.  

 

Knowing what we do about police behavior and brutally, why would anyone purposefully tempt fate?  We know they have a shoot first mentality.  I would rather be arrested wrongfully than shot in the back.  Yes everything they did was wrong and criminal,  that doesn't change the outcome.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Chicano3000 said:

What in the fuck?!. Why didn't he just put his gun away? What's the point in not backing off and apprehending later, especially when we know the guy was just trying to get in his car? Really everyone knows this makes American police look brutal and evil who would will fucking shoot you if you don't do what they say. Why risk it getting yourself into this situation as a cop? I don't get it...

:cosby2:

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Twinblade said:

Except tasers aren't fool proof....why would a cop risk his life using one if there's any chance he could be confronted with a lethal weapon?

I'm gonna need you to point out the timestamp for when one of the officers involved has their life at risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Teh_Diplomat said:

I'm gonna need you to point out the timestamp for when one of the officers involved has their life at risk.

Are you serious?

 

Someone who is aggressively disobeying the police suddenly opens their car door and then REACHES down towards the car door pocket/under the seat, places where someone could easily store a handgun. What else is the nearest officer supposed to do? He has a split second to make a decision, and he's not going to just sit back and politely allow someone to potentially grab a lethal weapon and use it on them.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...