HDR flat out sucks

[DynamiteCop 2,087]

Just now, jehurey said:

Oh, and by the way the diffuser is not something that exists along the edges, like a strip.

 

Its a sheet.

 

 

 

Once again another perfect visual illustration:

 

 

 

Look at the path of the yellow arrows. The LED bulbs in the edge-lit screen will NEVER GET to the LCD layer without re-directing of the light. Basically putting other layers to help the light bounce around all over.

 

Look at the visual representation of the LED and how it exists outside of all of those layers.

 

Now look at the DIRECT-LED, and look where those LED bulbs are at.

 

They are within those layers, and they are clearly shining light in one direction. A reflector exists behind it so that it helps bounce any light that may have spilled back there.

No shit you idiot, I said it probably goes up further into the bezel as does the LCD panel itself... I'm fully aware of what the diffuser is and its form. 

[lynux3 2,107]

3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Oh, and by the way the diffuser is not something that exists along the edges, like a strip.

 

Its a sheet.

 

 

Once again another perfect visual illustration:

 

 

Look at the path of the yellow arrows. The LED bulbs in the edge-lit screen will NEVER GET to the LCD layer without re-directing of the light. Basically putting other layers to help the light bounce around all over.

 

Look at the visual representation of the LED and how it exists outside of all of those layers.

 

Now look at the DIRECT-LED, and look where those LED bulbs are at.

 

They are within those layers, and they are clearly shining light in one direction. A reflector exists behind it so that it helps bounce any light that may have spilled back there.

Crazy how the LEDs are behind everything like that. Even crazier they call it backlighting. 

 

Thanks for unintentionally proving us right.

Edited July 6, 2020 by lynux3

[DynamiteCop 2,087]

3 minutes ago, lynux3 said:

Crazy how the LEDs are behind everything like that. Even crazier they call it backlighting. 

Is he even looking at what he's posting lol...

 

 

[Remij 4,686]

Jehurey literally posting this shit  

 

 

"Edge-lit BLACKLIGHT"

 

Shows EXACTLY why it's backlighting lol...

 

 

Jerry, I'm asking you to just please stop.  This is gone on far too long already  

[jehurey 3,238]

5 minutes ago, lynux3 said:

He just explained how this shit is working and all you got from that from was "downfire"? Yeah, you're a lost cause. Not like you weren't before or anything.

Because it effectively proves that the Edge-LEDs cannot illuminate the LCD layer from where its positioned and "firing"

 

hence its NOT a backlight.

3 minutes ago, lynux3 said:

Crazy how the LEDs are behind everything like that. Even crazier they call it backlighting. 

 

Thanks for unintentionally proving us right.

No, an industry using a general term is not crazy.

 

Both of you pretending to play stupid and declare that interpreting such a term in the most obtuse manner possible is your "proof" is rather crazy.

 

And desperate.

 

The LEDs in the edge-lit diagram were OUTSIDE of everything like that.

 

Thanks for still continuing to fail.

[lynux3 2,107]

2 minutes ago, DynamitCop! ALM said:

Is he even looking at what he's posting lol...

 

 

Refresh.

[jehurey 3,238]

2 minutes ago, DynamitCop! ALM said:

Is he even looking at what he's posting lol...

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Remij_ said:

Jehurey literally posting this shit  

 

 

"Edge-lit BLACKLIGHT"

 

Shows EXACTLY why it's backlighting lol...

 

 

Jerry, I'm asking you to just please stop.  This is gone on far too long already  

We've already talked about backlight, and how you guys interpret it obtusely.

 

I've already used the term "Horsepower".

 

You can visually see the LED being OUTSIDE of all of those panels.

 

And, with the DIRECT-LED, you can clearly see the LED being WITHIN those panels.

 

I love how you guys thought you had a genuine glimmer of hope...............boy are you poor bastards desperate.

[lynux3 2,107]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Because it effectively proves that the Edge-LEDs cannot illuminate the LCD layer from where its positioned and "firing"

 

hence its NOT a backlight.

No, an industry using a general term is not crazy.

 

Both of you pretending to play stupid and declare that interpreting such a term in the most obtuse manner possible is your "proof" is rather crazy.

 

And desperate.

 

The LEDs in the edge-lit diagram were OUTSIDE of everything like that.

 

Thanks for still continuing to fail.

Calling us desperate.

[Remij 4,686]

Just now, jehurey said:

 

We've already talked about backlight, and how you guys interpret it obtusely.

 

 

Guess your source is too  

 

[DynamiteCop 2,087]

Just now, jehurey said:

 

We've already talked about backlight, and how you guys interpret it obtusely.

 

I've already used the term "Horsepower".

 

You can visually see the LED being OUTSIDE of all of those panels.

 

And, with the DIRECT-LED, you can clearly see the LED being WITHIN those panels.

 

I love how you guys thought you had a genuine glimmer of hope...............boy are you poor bastards desperate.

We're not interpreting anything because there's nothing to interpret. Something is or it is not, and this 100% for a fact is. 

 

You're trying to interpret something which has no ability to be interpreted, it's not subjective, it's not an opinion, it's not up to a differing perspective, and it's not something that can be argued.

 

Edge-Lit LED's are backlit displays. 

[jehurey 3,238]

1 minute ago, lynux3 said:

Calling us desperate.

yeah............especially considering you just tried pretending I didn't give you a final answer, and pretended to play stupid.

 

Look at the both of you immediately jump up with a glimmer of energy.

 

You are desperate.

 

There is nothing in that imagine that I haven't already explained to you about 8 times now.

[lynux3 2,107]

Well this thread ended exactly how I thought it would. Jerry spinning faster than his jerry-go-round. Perfect ending.

[jehurey 3,238]

Just now, Remij_ said:

Guess your source is too  

 

Well, they're using an common industry term that is decades old.

 

You must be forgetting the first word there...................edge-lit.

 

They're clearly telling you the the lights ONLY exist from the edge.

[ChupacabraIII 134]

Ghostz top tier trolling ITT

[jehurey 3,238]

Just now, lynux3 said:

Well this thread ended exactly how I thought it would. Jerry spinning faster than his jerry-go-round. Perfect ending.

guess that glimmer went out. LOL

[DynamiteCop 2,087]

Just now, jehurey said:

Well, they're using an common industry term that is decades old.

 

You must be forgetting the first word there...................edge-lit.

 

They're clearly telling you the the lights ONLY exist from the edge.

No it's not because it's an industry term, it's because on the horizontal axis forward to back the LED's are positioned behind the LCD and in conjunction with the reflector, light guide and diffuser broadcast that light forward from the back and through the LCD frontward.

 

It's not because of terminology, it's because of the technology, and because of what is taking place behind the LCD panel...

[jehurey 3,238]

2 minutes ago, DynamitCop! ALM said:

We're not interpreting anything because there's nothing to interpret. Something is or it is not, and this 100% for a fact is. 

 

You're trying to interpret something which has no ability to be interpreted, it's not subjective, it's not an opinion, it's not up to a differing perspective, and it's not something that can be argued.

 

Edge-Lit LED's are backlit displays. 

No, they are not. They are edge-lit.

 

that's the most ironic part of all of this..........is that you guys are hanging your entire argument behind the use of the general industry term "backlight" which causes you to forget the term "edge-lit."

 

I'll say it again.

 

You either know what the words "back" and "light" means,or you don't. And you either know what the word "outside" means, or you don't.

 

I even said............for marketing purposes, if Samsung's legal term genuinely believes that edge-lit displays is on the backside the same as direct-lit displays............why don't they call ALL OF IT "direct-lit from the back" displays is they see it as obtusely as you do?

 

Because they'd get sued, and they know it.

[jehurey 3,238]

2 minutes ago, DynamitCop! ALM said:

No it's not because it's an industry term, it's because on the horizontal axis forward to back the LED's are positioned behind the LCD and in conjunction with the reflector, light guide and diffuser broadcast that light forward from the back and through the LCD frontward.

 

It's not because of terminology, it's because of the technology, and because of what is taking place behind the LCD panel...

then the proper terminology is back-panel light reflector/diffusor.

 

and still doesn't make it "back-lit".

[lynux3 2,107]

Just now, jehurey said:

then the proper terminology is back-panel light reflector/diffusor.

 

and still doesn't make it "back-lit".

[DynamiteCop 2,087]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

then the proper terminology is back-panel light reflector/diffusor.

 

and still doesn't make it "back-lit".

No it's not the proper terminology, because you're just making shit up and giving things name, and trying to explain your way out of things you yourself posted which corroborate the fact and function of this display that we've been saying since square one and that you've been in denial over. 

Edited July 6, 2020 by DynamitCop! ALM